Things to consider: Among the list of important concerns that we facial area when doing file-based mostly migrations is which tool is the greatest with the occupation. Eventually EMC added isi_vol_copy_vnx that allowed NDMP- centered copy from VNX to the Isilon. Isi_vol_copy: The isi_vol_copy utility from Isilon uses NDMP streams to repeat data from a NetApp array to your Isilon array. VNX Replicator: This Device can replicate from Celerra/VNX to another Celerra/VNX array.
A lot of the instruments were made for disaster Restoration while others were being created explicitly for details migration.
RSYNC: This UNIX utility is useful for NFS migrations.Īs engineering Superior, storage sellers supplied a method to complete these migrations using internal instruments.
EMCOPY INCREMENTAL VS FULL WINDOWS
ROBOCOPY: This Microsoft utility, at first A part of the Windows NT four.0 Useful resource Kit, has existed considering the fact that 1997.ĮMCOPY: This EMC utility is used mainly to repeat to some Celerra based file method even so, the other applications while in the suite comprised of EMCopy, Sharedup, and LGDUP are utilised on numerous occasions, even together with Robocopy. Many of the instruments that I have leveraged over time include things like: The vast majority of migrations are actually SMB-based including server-to-server, server-to-NAS, and NAS-to-NAS migrations. I happen to be accomplishing file-centered migrations for properly above twenty years, largely with EMC Engineering. I need to share some suggestions that may help you simplify your migration things to do. Any help on commands switches or tools to help with this would be most welcomed.ģ - We are also finding performance quite slow even though we have EMCopy running from the source Windows server, any other performance tips would be most welcomed.Want to reduce platform migration complications? Minimize cost, work, and missing time? You are in the appropriate spot.
EMCOPY INCREMENTAL VS FULL UPDATE
This is the command I have been using to update the Target volume following an initial run:Ĭ:\EMcopy>"C:\EMcopy\emcopy.exe" c:\Temp\ \\Sk-test\FSTEST01\CJB\ *.* /o /s /c /r:1 /z /f /sdd /d /log+:C:\EMCopy\log1.txtĢ - The customer who is performing the final checks to ensure that the source and target volumes are identical before moving the users across to the Celerra, is finding the information provided by EMCopy not reliable and having to employ other pieces of software to check that EMCopy has moved everything across. This is the command I have been using for the initial or only run:Ĭ:\EMcopy>"C:\EMcopy\emcopy.exe" c:\Temp\ \\Sk-test\FSTEST01\CJB\ *.* /o /s /c /r:1 /z /f /sdd /log+:C:\EMCopy\log1.txt I have been doing a few tests but I would like any recommendation on the switches I am using. Now we are coming to move much large volumes of data, we need to be able to run a first pass a week or two before we cut over and then a final one on the day we cut over. I have some questions which I would like some help and guidance on.ġ - Because of the chunks of data we have had to move we have been able to do them in one run over a weekend. I now have the latest copy so hopefully things will be better. I am performing quite a bit of data migration from a Windows environment to the Celerra, we have been using EMCopy v4.0 which as many people have commented has not been that reliable.